Emory University Campus Life Center

Emory University Campus Life Center

 

  • Size: 117,000 sq.ft
  • Construction Cost: $90M
  • Architect: Duda Paine Architects
  • MEP Engineers: IMEG Corp
  • Contractor: Holder Construction

 

Emory University Campus Life Center

  • Size: 117,000 sq.ft
  • Construction Cost: $90M
  • Architect: Duda Paine Architects
  • MEP Engineers: IMEG Corp
  • Contractor: Holder Construction
Cost Optimization
Saved $1M in construction cost
Energy Saving
40% Energy Savings and LEED Platinum
Integrative Automated Workflow
Saved 240 Hours from Design Revisions

01// Project Overview

At 117,00 sq. ft., the Campus Life Center on the Emory University campus caters to the growing space demands, allows flexibility and efficient dining services, technology and infrastructure upgrades, and  more room for student organizations and gathering space. With the University’s commitment to sustainability, the Campus Life Center has high performance targets

02// Climate Analysis

Climate Data – A basic understanding of the existing climate conditions is vital for making performance design decisions. The following climate studies are created `automatically using cove.tool.​​

03// Energy Analysis

A basic understanding of target values is key to comparing performance design decisions.
EUI – Expressed as energy per square foot per year, knowing the EUI values of design decisions and other iterations, one can get the best value for performance. Below the design team used cove.tool to find their buildings benchmarks in order to inform and guide the team towards setting their own energy targets. The USA national median for EUI was 51 kBtu/sqft/yr.

04// Daylight and Glare Analysis

Daylight quantity and quality is a critical part of any building. It becomes especially critical when studying a campus center with students. Many studies have linked daylight to productivity and wellness. Cove.tool allowed the team to use the Revit model export for the following daylight and glare studies.

05// Facade Studies

The ability to rapidly test out varying facade design and compare glazing percentage, overhangs vs fins, window sizes and location was critical for the facade design. The below study created using cove.tool’s rapid facade prototyping features allows users to do that in minutes.

06// Water Use Analysis

Being a part of the campus meant studying not just indoor water use for low flow fixtures, but also outdoor water use. This meant grey water re-use strategies, storm water capture, rain water harvesting, irrigation and more. The cove.tool water feature had not been launched at the time of this project. This feature allows users to study indoor and outdoor water use for their project as shown  below.

07// Cost Vs Energy Optimization

Being a integrated team with the contractors on board at early stages of design, cost was a critical component of decision making throughout the design. This cost was able to be optimized using cove.tool. cove.tool uses advanced algorithms to optimize for first cost and assists in making rigorous metric based decisions on cost and energy.
As seen in the diagram above, many decisions including, window type, wall insulation, roof insulation, HVAC, Photovoltaic panels, shading strategy and sensors had multiple options that needed to be tested. This leads to over 20,000 possible combinations, each with a different energy use and a different cost. Cove.tool allowed studying these and finding the most cost optimal way to get to the
​In the graph above, each vertical line represents one decision. The blue line represents every possible combination and these can be filtered based on potential LEED points, EUI, Energy Savings, Payback and First Cost Premiums. For a project with a target payback less than 10 years and EUI target of 45  or below
The design team used cove.tool to find the absolute lowest cost option.

Related Posts

air ventilation system
07 Feb, 2023
Load modeling is an aspect of building design that is most often performed by an engineer locally on their workstation or even via pen and paper. By moving fundamental engineering calculations onto a web-based load modeling platform, design teams can unlock a myriad of benefits, including increased efficiency and greater collaboration.
Man working on construction site scaffolding
27 Jan, 2023
With more attention on ESG, Scope 3, C-BAM, and other key standards, access to accurate data for building projects and products is essential to the creation of high-performance buildings and the ability to report on them. To make performance data more accessible and help streamline sales and marketing processes for building product manufacturers, cove.tool released its new performance software solution, revgen.tool.
Whole Building Energy Modeling in cove.tool
25 Jan, 2023
Whole Building Energy Modeling, or BEM, is a flexible, highly capable tool used in the design of new and retrofit buildings, code compliance, certifications, incentive programs, and more. At its core, BEM is a physics-based simulation of building energy use. Through advanced software, these simulations are performed with sub-hourly timesteps, providing a considerable amount of insight into the performance of the simulated building.
ESG for Building Product Manufacturers: EPD, Scope 3, and CBAM Explained
06 Jan, 2023
If you work in the building product industry, you may have come across terms like ESG, EPD, Scope 3, or CBAM and wondered what they mean and how they pertain to your business. Each of these terms is related to the environmental impact of building products and can have a significant effect on sales. In this blog, we'll explore these terms in detail and discuss how they impact building product manufacturers.
Share by: